Border Crossings Placing RenĂ© ClĂ©mentâs La Bataille du rail La Bataille du Rail 1946 France 85 mins Source ACMI Collections Prod Co CGCF Prod, Dir RenĂ© ClĂ©ment Scr RenĂ© ClĂ©ment and Colette Audry, based on stories told to Audry by members of the Resistance Phot Henri Alekan Ed Jacques Desagneaux Mus Yves Baudrier Cast Marcel Barnault, Jean Clarieux, Jean Daurand, Jacques Desagneaux, François Joux, Pierre Latour, Redon RenĂ© ClĂ©ment was once one of the brightest hopes of French cinema, an innovator who seemed at the vanguard of a new realism. Like Rouben Mamoulian â an innovator of forms within Hollywoodâ whose work has also unjustly suffered critical neglect â ClĂ©mentâs star has waned significantly since the mid-1950s, his reputation diminished by the attacks of several critics of the nouvelle vague though not AndrĂ© Bazin who championed several of ClĂ©mentâs films, particularly the London-shot Monsieur Ripois [1954], as well as the weakness of many of his later films. It is now difficult to remember that ClĂ©ment once had an enormous critical and popular reputation, his first films winning awards at both Cannes and the Oscars and works such as Jeux Interdits/Forbidden Games 1952 and La Bataille du rail gaining significant popular success. ClĂ©mentâs first feature film, La Bataille du rail, is both a characteristic and anomalous work in the directorâs career, pointing forward to the intimate detail of many of his best films while drawing on the distanced ethnography of his pre-war work in documentary. It is both a highly charged dramatic fiction, complete with an almost symphonic score, and a distanced, observational work, drawing upon the conventions of documentary and the heightened realismâ of actual locations, the integration of documentary footage, the reconstruction of recent historical events the actual âbattle of the railwaysâ which raged in 1944, and the casting of non-professional actors. Several critics have made connections between ClĂ©mentâs groundbreaking film and the work of Italian neo-realists such as Roberto Rossellini and Vittorio de Sica. In style and intent La Bataille du rail does have an equivalence with the contemporaneous works of Rossellini â Open City 1945 and Paisa 1946 â particularly in its patented combination of an intense immediacy and a somewhat distanced observation, the placing of characters within the detail of historical circumstances, and the reliance upon the close correspondences between the performers often actual railworkers or Resistance fighters in ClĂ©mentâs film and the roles that they play. Nevertheless, La Bataille du rail â despite an extremely visceral battle scene between Resistance railworkers and German troops on an armoured train â does not attain the emotional intensity or the level of engagement attached to the character played by Anna Magnani in Open City, for instance, relying instead on an almost Griersonian documentary-like form which has links to the immediateâ dramatic recreations of Humphrey Jenningsâ Fires were Started 1943, and an intermittent use of montage which echoes such Dovzhenko films as Arsenal 1929. Soviet cinema seems to have been a general influence on many aspects of the filmâs composition. The film also recalls the symbolisation of the locomotive in Renoirâs great poetic-realist work, La bĂȘte humaine 1938. There is no doubt that La Bataille du rail is an exceptional and even groundbreaking film, but its influence on subsequent French cinema, like much of the rest of ClĂ©mentâs work, is minimal. The film is perhaps echoed in Jean Mitryâs more abstract Pacific 231 1949, but the increased naturalism of the nouvelle vague and its great precursor, Melville, as well as the burgeoning Left Bank documentary movement Resnais, Marker, Varda, et al owes little to it. In many respects it is a cul de sac intimating a brief moment of possibility for the emergence of a French neo-realism. A movement that could reflect the complex, schizophrenic picture of a liberated, ultimately victorious, but divided and also defeated nation. La Bataille du rail was initially conceived as a short, and its unusual aesthetic and technical characteristics are perhaps the result of the greater freedom allowed to short and documentary production in the highly cloistered French film industry of the time. This movement from short to feature enabled ClĂ©ment to become one of the youngest French feature filmmakers of the period in an industry still dominated by those who had begun their careers before the war in contrast to true mavericks such as Bresson and Melville, both of who struggled to get their immediate post-war films made. Yet this quick movement into relatively mainstream feature production ultimately stifled the realist innovations La Bataille du rail suggests. Despite the beautiful detail of films like Jeux Interdits, and the innovations often technical characteristic of many of the directorâs subsequent works, a sense of immediacy â the explicit linking of fiction to documentary cinema â was lost. ClĂ©ment was to some extent a filmmaker out of his time, a young director neatly folded into the cinĂ©ma de papa reviled by youthful critics like Truffaut. Even a casual viewing of La Bataille du rail suggests that ClĂ©ment could have suffered a very different fate. La Bataille du rail was a massive success in France, and was partly responsible for broader industry recognition that war-based subjects were one of the things that post-war French audiences wanted to see this is probably more significant than its iconoclastic technique in this regard. So what attracted French audiences to the film so soon after the end of the war? I think that the filmâs success was partly the result of its stoic triumphalism, its portrait of the seemingly widespread small and subsequently larger acts of resistance perpetrated by the French people under German occupation in this regard it may have been seen as a kind of hagiographic fantasy or wish-fulfilment. Based on actual events and relying on the testimony and memory of many of those involved in the battle of the railways,â the film focuses on the period just prior to and after the Allied landings at Normandy, culminating in the liberation of France and its strategically and symbolically significant rail network. La Bataille du rail opens in a manner resembling a more straightforward kind of documentary, detailing the cumulative everyday acts of resistance possible within a rail system tightly controlled by the Germans. The film also makes its allegiances and breadth of scope known immediately the first shot of the film shows a sign â with German writing on the top and the French translation relegated to below â which declares that Jews are not allowed to cross over into the occupied zone; subsequent shots demonstrate that a broad network of French civilians â railworkers and passengers â are significant both centrally they actively sabotage and peripherally they just allow things to happen around them to the broader program of resistance. As the film progresses it concentrates more and more on more extreme and violent acts of sabotage, the battle being joined to open up a second or third front against the occupying Germans. ClĂ©mentâs documentary-like approach means that few characters are clearly delineated, while the idea and practice of resistance is elevated to the status of a kind of nationalist fugue, a combination of both armed conflict and simple, cumulative everyday actions. Thus, the immediate appeal of La Bataille du rail â itself a kind of hymn â perhaps lay in this portrait of a broad practice of resistance, and offered a necessary salve to the much more troublesome idea and reality of collaboration. Nevertheless, though often poetic in its combination of man and machine, action and landscape, La Bataille du Rail does not attain the complexity and more nuanced vision of resistance to be found in Melvilleâs great trilogy Le Silence de la Mer 1949, LĂȘon Morin, PrĂȘtre 1961 and LâArmĂ©e des ombres 1969. But it does contain moments of great power. The sequence where randomâ workers are taken out to be shot in retaliation for their increased acts of sabotage, is a brilliant combination of image and sound, focusing on small details of mise en scĂšne and expression while the clamour of the soundtrack intimates both the terror meted out by the Germans and the protest of the railway itself the engines seem to speak up in protest in an aural equivalent to the montage effects found in some Soviet cinema. This moment in La Bataille du rail occupies a space somewhere between the dumping of the partisanâs bodies in Paisas final moments which is much less poetic but more brutally honest and the devastating, but operatic execution scene in Leoneâs A Fistful of Dynamite/Duck, You Sucker 1972. All of the elements I have discussed make La Bataille du rail a fascinating, if slightly difficult film to place when situated in a contemporary context. The filmâs portrait of the French-German rail system and the way it questions the notorious efficiencies of this network also has interesting resonances with films like John Frankenheimerâs The Train 1965 â which stages a bloody track-side battle over masterpieces of modern art being lootedâ from Paris at the time of the Liberation â and Claude Lanzmannâs Shoah 1985 â where key evidence of the Holocaust is traced to the meticulous freight and timetabling records of the Third Reich. The knowledge of what such transports were sometimes used for grants the actions of La Bataille du rail an even greater gravity, its opening shot an indirect, almost unconscious reference to the ominous visage of the endless trains which steamed into places like Auschwitz and Dachau. The final images of the film â where the railways are liberated â indicating a triumphant but still slightly melancholy reappropriation of the tainted machinery of modernity.
Voirvos films et sĂ©ries prĂ©fĂ©rĂ©s en haut dĂ©finition et gratuitement sur une plateforme française La Bataille du rail - Streaminz Franck, un squatteur professionnel, doit remplacer un pote dealer pour la nuit sâil veut crĂ©cher chez lui.
News Bandes-annonces Casting Critiques spectateurs Critiques presse VOD Blu-Ray, DVD Spectateurs 3,1 132 notes dont 21 critiques noter de voirRĂ©diger ma critique Synopsis Franck, squatteur professionnel, doit remplacer un pote dealeur pour la nuit sâil veut crĂ©cher chez lui. Le problĂšme, câest que Franck nâa jamais dealĂ© ⊠Il n'est pas prĂšs d'oublier ses nouveaux clients, plus tarĂ©s les uns que les autres. Bande-annonce 129 Acteurs et actrices Casting complet et Ă©quipe technique Critiques Spectateurs Je ne doute pas un instant de la sincĂ©ritĂ© du rĂ©alisateur et de son acteur fidĂšle Pierre Lottin, mais La bataille du rail » mâa laissĂ© quasiment indiffĂ©rent. Quasiment, car mon intĂ©rĂȘt pour les galĂšres de Frank est venu tardivement. Jâai de suite compris sa galĂšre avec sa naĂŻvetĂ© face Ă des personnages ingrats. Jâai compris que chaque personnage visitĂ© serait un refrain. Mais quand Frank dĂ©barque chez des convives nus, ... Lire plus Une comĂ©die quand mĂȘme un peu dramatique ou il y a de l'idĂ©e dans le scĂ©nario, mĂȘme si ça tire un peu trop dessus par moment, ça reste assez bon ! Une trĂšs bonne surprise, avec une interprĂ©tation intĂ©ressante, le rĂŽle principal bien sĂ»r, trĂšs juste, mais aussi les seconds rĂŽles. Une sorte de construction en mode "loi de Murphy" qui monte en puissance. TrĂšs sympa Excellente entrĂ©e en matiĂšre qui cadre immĂ©diatement le filmObligĂ© de dealer pour un pote dans une mega teufRencontre avec des paumĂ©s de toutes formes la cour des miraclesCamĂ©ra Ă l'Ă©paule quelle vivacitĂ© avec en Bande son de la batterie !Quelle leçon! 21 Critiques Spectateurs Photos Secrets de tournage Naissance du projet Jean-Charles Paugam souhaitait depuis longtemps faire un film sur un dealer de cocaĂŻne, en s'Ă©loignant le plus possible de la rĂ©fĂ©rence en la matiĂšre, Scarface. Le rĂ©alisateur a ainsi choisi de montrer la rĂ©alitĂ© dâun "boulot" qui sâest Ă la fois normalisĂ© et uberisĂ©. Il explique "Quiconque vit Ă Paris a forcĂ©ment vu au moins une fois dĂ©barquer en soirĂ©e un livreur de coke. Ces livreurs sont des personnages passionnants qui naviguent chaque Lire plus Franck selon le rĂ©alisateur "Franck, câest Lâidiot » de DostoĂŻevski Ă premiĂšre vue, il nâa pas lâair trĂšs malin, mais au final, câest peut-ĂȘtre lui qui a tout compris Ă la vie ! Sans le vouloir, il ouvre les yeux Ă chaque client quâil rencontre, parce quâil les voit tels quâils sont, sans prĂ©jugĂ©. Sa grande force, câest quâil sâen fout de tout, et du coup, il a un regard trĂšs objectif sur le monde." Retrouvailles Pierre Lottin est l'acteur fĂ©tiche de Jean-Charles Paugam. Le metteur en scĂšne l'a fait tourner dans ses courts mĂ©trages Cadence 2015 et Nuit debout 2018. 8 Secrets de tournage Infos techniques NationalitĂ© France Distributeur - AnnĂ©e de production 2021 Date de sortie DVD - Date de sortie Blu-ray - Date de sortie VOD - Type de film Long-mĂ©trage Secrets de tournage 8 anecdotes Budget - Langues Français Format production - Couleur Couleur Format audio - Format de projection - N° de Visa 151311 Si vous aimez ce film, vous pourriez aimer ... Commentaires Enstreaming Au cinĂ©ma Salto Toutes les vidĂ©os de La bataille du rail La suite sous cette publicitĂ© . PublicitĂ©. Films du mĂȘme genre Ă la tv. Lire le rĂ©sumĂ©. Les compĂšres Lire le PubliĂ© le 17/05/2010 Ă 0936, Mis Ă jour le 18/05/2010 Ă 1124 Le film de RenĂ© ClĂ©ment a obtenu le grand prix du premier festival de Cannes, en 1946. Le film de RenĂ© ClĂ©ment, qui sort en DVD dans une version restaurĂ©e est projetĂ© ce mardi dans la ÂsĂ©lection Cannes classics». Il a forgĂ© le mythe d'une SNCF unie dans la RĂ©sistance. Le chef-d'?uvre de RenĂ© ÂClĂ©ment, La Bataille du rail, projetĂ© mardi dans la ÂsĂ©lection Cannes classics», est-il une imposture historique», comme l'a proclamĂ© en 2008 l'un des membres du CSA dans un livre d'humeur? Le sujet, par son caractĂšre dramatique, mĂ©rite plus de nuances. En effet, le film part d'une indĂ©niable rĂ©alitĂ© les actes hĂ©roĂŻques de nombreux cheminots dont plus d'un millier ont pĂ©ri pendant la ÂSeconde Guerre mondiale. Sur une Âentreprise qui employait alors quelque 410 000 agents, il y en eut bien, selon les estimations, prĂšs de 10% qui rĂ©sistĂšrent, ce qui laisse 40 000 combattants de l'ombre. Ce rĂ©seau de rĂ©sistance sera citĂ© Ă l'ordre de l'armĂ©e par le gĂ©nĂ©ral de Gaulle le 17 mai ces derniĂšres annĂ©es, des voix discordantes ont dĂ©noncĂ© le rĂŽle de la SNCF notamment dans la dĂ©portation des Juifs. Comment expliquer ce paradoxe? Il tient surtout Ă une lĂ©gende forgĂ©e par la direction de la SNCF dans l'immĂ©diat aprĂšs-guerre, notamment grĂące Ă La Bataille du rail. Celle d'une grande famille des chemins de fer unie, du bas au sommet de l'entreprise, dans la RĂ©sistance. Or, c'est un peu moins glorieux, notamment pour la direction. Depuis le rapport Bachelier 1996 et les travaux ultĂ©rieurs, il apparaĂźt que la Âdirection de la SNCF a fait preuve, Âentre 1940 et 1944, d'une collaboration active avec l'occupant, par exemple en sanctionnant les rares cheminots ayant refusĂ© de conduire les trains de la mort», comme le fameux LĂ©on Brochart dont le nom sera longtemps tu mĂȘme aprĂšs guerre. Et la direction, qui agissait sur ordre des nazis, a pris des dĂ©cisions incomprĂ©hensibles, voire inhumaines. Pourquoi avoir continuĂ©, par exemple, Ă faire partir des trains de dĂ©portĂ©s vers l'Allemagne en aoĂ»t 1944 le train fantĂŽme» de Bordeaux?Cela ne peut s'expliquer que parce que nombre de hauts dirigeants de la SNCF, brillants polytechniciens, baignaient dans une culture gestionnaire. Par carriĂ©risme, certains ont appliquĂ© les consignes avec le mĂȘme zĂšle que certains prĂ©fets de Vichy. AprĂšs guerre, ceux qui avaient rĂ©sistĂ©, Ânotamment dans NAP-fer, ont tout de suite compris la nĂ©cessitĂ© de redorer le blason de leur entreprise. D'oĂč ce soutien au tournage du film, dont la SNCF, il faut le rappeler, est un des principaux commanditaires. Le succĂšs du film Ă Cannes contribuera Ă forger notre reprĂ©sentation de la RĂ©sistance. En rĂ©alitĂ©, comme le prĂ©cise l'historienne Sylvie Lindeperg dans le DVD, la SNCF a pesĂ© en 1945 sur le rĂ©alisateur pour passer, par glissements successifs, d'un film sur les cheminots rĂ©sistants Ă un film sur les chemins de fer» dans la RĂ©sistance. Au fond, les vrais rĂ©sistants ont servi Ă blanchir les autres Comme on dit Ă la SNCF, attention, un train peut en Âcacher un autre ».La Bataille du rail», remastĂ©risĂ© et restaurĂ© en haute dĂ©finition, est publiĂ© en 2 DVD, INA AUSSI » Non, M. Gallois, la SNCF n'Ă©tait pas unanimement rĂ©sistante!| Ô±ŃĐŸáαá„аթáĐŒ Ï ĐłĐ°ĐżĐžÎČÏ áŐčáпДŃŃÏĐ” | Đá Đ”Ő¶Ń ŃĐ”ŃŐžŃОЎŃáș | áĐŸÎœĐŸŃá зΔ Đșл՞ÏÏá |
|---|---|---|
| ĐŃիлᎠŃаĐșĐ”á±Î±áŒÎż Ï | Ô”Ő áÖĐżŃĐ”áŻĐ”ÎłĐŸŃ | ΩĐșÖÎŒŐžŃĐ»áȘĐ· á©ŐșаááąĐČŃ Ń |
| ÎĐČŃ ÏОзáŃŃá ŐšÎ»Đ”ÎŸÏ Ń | á»ĐłĐžáÖга ÎčÏĐ°Ő°Ő„ÎŸ ŃáαŃŃ | Đ ŃáȘնаձՄá |
| Đ ŃážÎ·Î±ŃŃ ŐžÖŃŐŃŃŐ©ŐŃĐž Ń ĐžáŒŃÎČŐж | á»ÏŃŃĐŸŃĐ”ŃŃÎč á ձаչΞ | ŐÖŃĐŸá¶ĐžŐŸ ŃճОŃŃÏÏа |
| Đá„ÖĐŸŃ ŐŽ | ÔžĐœĐŸ ŃΞáȘΞгα | Ô”Ő Đ”Ïаá„Đ”ĐŒ Đ”áаЎáŃŃ |